No Products in the Cart
View your saved carts
WARNING: This Product Contains Nicotine. Nicotine is an addictive chemical.
A major court ruling out of Iowa just changed the game for vape shops, manufacturers, and adult consumers—not just in one state, but across the country.
The case centered around House File 2677, a restrictive law that was set to go into effect in February 2025. The bill aimed to ban nearly all vaping products that didn’t receive FDA marketing approval before 2016—essentially wiping out most of the products currently on shelves.
But thanks to a federal court decision led by Chief U.S. District Judge Stephanie Rose, the law has been blocked—for now. The court ruled that Iowa’s attempt to enforce federal tobacco standards at the state level violated the U.S. Constitution’s Supremacy Clause, which says federal law trumps state law. In other words, the state overstepped.
What the Law Would Have Done
Under HF 2677, Iowa would have created a state-run registry of “approved” vape products. Anything not on the list? Banned. Shops could face steep fines—or lose their business licenses altogether.
For local vape shops that depend on flavored options and newer innovations, this was a direct threat to their survival.
What the Ruling Means
The preliminary injunction means the law can't be enforced while the case plays out in court. That’s a huge relief for small businesses and the adults who rely on these products as a harm-reduction option—especially as many use vaping to quit smoking.
Let’s not forget vaping is already under heavy federal regulation. And while the industry isn’t allowed to advertise health benefits, studies and public health experts have acknowledged that vaping is significantly less harmful than smoking.
No combustion. No tar. Just a handful of ingredients—and far fewer toxicants than cigarettes.
Why Vaping Matters
Even though we can't say it in ads, the truth is: vaping works—especially for adult smokers trying to quit.
It mimics the rituals of smoking (like hand-to-mouth movement and nicotine delivery), but without many of the downsides. It’s cleaner, more affordable in the long run, and gives users the freedom to choose the flavors and devices that work for them.
That’s why access to these products is so important—and why this ruling matters.
Beyond Iowa: A National Impact
Iowa’s win could set the tone for similar battles in other states. North Carolina is already seeing legal challenges to nearly identical legislation. Now, Iowa’s case can serve as a legal precedent, making it clear that states can’t override or duplicate federal regulations just because they want tighter control.
For small businesses, this ruling shows that state overreach can be challenged—and defeated.
Advocacy in Action
This victory wasn’t an accident. It’s the result of relentless work from KURE, E-Liquid Brands, IFAST (Iowans for Alternatives to Smoking & Tobacco), countless small businesses, and passionate supporters who refused to give up.
But we’re not done yet.
More states are trying to pass similar laws. More small businesses are at risk. And more adult consumers are in danger of losing access to the products that help them quit smoking for good.
Let Iowa be a turning point—not just a win, but a rallying cry.
Here’s What You Can Do:
Iowa proved that when we stand together, we can protect our industry—and win. Now it’s up to all of us to keep that momentum going.
SOURCES:
Tobacco Reporter
Iowa Judge Halts Law that Would Pull Vapes from Shelves
The court ruled that HF 2677 "impermissibly intrudes upon the federal government’s exclusive authority" to enforce the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.
Regulatory Oversight
Federal Court Pumps the Brakes on Iowa Vape Directory
Details the preliminary injunction against HF 2677 and its implications for the vaping industry.
Iowa Department of Revenue
Vapor Products Directory - Department of Revenue
Official statement noting that enforcement of the vapor products directory is on hold due to a court order issued on May 2, 2025.
